Residues, An Alternative for Reducing Water Contamination, Leaching, and Greenhouse Gas Emission

Authors

Zohreh Shams , Maryam Heidari , Reza Mokhtari

DOI:

10.25047/agriprima.v7i2.555

Issue:

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): SEPTEMBER

Keywords:

Anggur, Kontaminasi Air, Limpasan Nitrat, Residu Tanaman
Received: Jul 20, 2023
Accepted: Sep 22, 2023
Published: Sep 30, 2023

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Shams, Z., Heidari, M., & Mokhtari, R. (2023). Residues, An Alternative for Reducing Water Contamination, Leaching, and Greenhouse Gas Emission. Agriprima : Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 7(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.25047/agriprima.v7i2.555

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of grape residue in reducing water contamination. Our findings revealed significant reductions in nitrate leaching upon the application of grape residues. Smaller residue particle sizes recorded greater reductions in nitrate leaching compared to larger ones. Utilizing grape waste branches for biochar production offers a sustainable solution, improving water retention, organic matter content, and reducing nutrient leaching. Biochar not only enhances nutrient retention but also promotes microbial activity and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, benefiting soil health and crop productivity. It also helps combat drought and salinity stress. Overall, grape biochar shows potential in mitigating nitrate pollution, enhancing soil quality, and promoting agricultural sustainability. It is important to consider the optimal biochar application rate and particle size to maximize its effectiveness in reducing nitrate leaching while minimizing any potential negative impacts on crop yield. Further research is required to optimize biochar application rates, particle sizes, and long-term effects in diverse agricultural systems. Implementing biochar as a soil amendment holds promise in improving soil health, water quality, and overall sustainability.

References

Are, K. S., Adelana, A. O., Fademi, I. O., Aina, O. A. 2017. Improving physical properties of degraded soil: Potential of poultry manure and biochar. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 51(6), 454-462.

Arumta, N., Mulyo, J., Irham. 2019. The export determinations of Indonesian cut flowers in the international market. AGRO EKONOMI. https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.44856

Brantley, K.E., Brye, K.R., Savin, M.C., and D.E. Longer. 2015. Biochar source and application rate effects on soil water retention determined using wetting curves. Open. J. Soil. Sci. 5:1–10.

Brender, J.D., Olive, J.M., Felkner, M. Suarez, L. Marckwardt, W., and K.A. Hendricks. 2004. Dietary nitrites and nitrates, nitrosatable drugs, and neural tube defects. Epidemiology. 15:330–336.

Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., & Stark, W. J. (2006). In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. Environmental science & technology, 40(14), 4374-4381.

Bruun, E.W., Ambus, P., Egsgaard, H., and H. Hauggaard-Nielsen. 2012. Effects of slow and fast pyrolysis biochar on soil C and N turnover dynamics. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 46:73–79.

Downie, A., Van Zwieten, L., Doughty, W., and F. Joseph. 2007. Nutrient retention characteristics of chars and the agronomic implications. In Proceedings, International Agrichar Initiative Conference, 30th April-2nd May.

Fan, R., Huang, Y. C., Grusak, M. A., Huang, C. P., & Sherrier, D. J. (2013). Effects of nano-TiO2 on the agronomically-relevant Rhizobium–legume symbiosis. Science of the Total Environment, 466, 503-512.

Fields, S. 2004. Global nitrogen: cycling out of control. Environ. Health. Perspect. 112:557–563.

Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B., van Kessel, C., and J. Six. 2009. Managing N availability and losses by combining fertilizer-N with different quality residues in Kenya. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 131:308–314.

Goolsby, D.A. 2000. Mississippi basin nitrogen flux believed to cause Gulf hypoxia. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 81:321–327.

Hollister, C.C., Bisogni, J.J., and J. Lehmann. 2013. Ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate sorption to and solute leaching from biochars prepared from corn stover and oak wood. J. Environ. Qual. 42:137–144

Laird, D.A., Fleming, P., Davis, D.D., Horton, R., Wang, B., and D.L. Karlen. 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma. 158:443–449.

Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (Eds.). 2015. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge.

Lie, J.H., Lv, G.H., Bai, W.B., Liu, Q., Zhang, Y.C., and J.Q. Song. 2014. Modification and use of biochar from wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) for nitrate and phosphate removal from water. Desalination. Water. Treat. 57:4681–4693.

Mirbakhsh, A., Lee, J. and Besenski, D. (2023) Development of a Signal-Free Intersection Control System for CAVs and Corridor Level Impact Assessment. Journal of Future Transportation, 3, 552-567. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp3020032

Mirbakhsh, M. (2023). Role of Nano-fertilizer in Plants Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE). J Gene Eng Bio Res, 5(1), 75-81.

Mirbakhsh, M. , Sohrabi Sedeh, S. S. & Zahed, Z. (2023). The Impact of Persian Clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.) on Soil Health. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6 (5) , 564-570. DOI: 10.47115/bsagriculture.1312940.

Mirbakhsh, M., Zahed, Z. (2023). Enhancing Phosphorus Uptake in Sugarcane: A Critical Evaluation of Humic Acid and Phosphorus Fertilizers’ Effectiveness. J Gene Eng Bio Res, 5(3), 133-145.

Nolan, B.T., Hitt, K.J., and B.C. Ruddy. 2002. Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36: 2138–2145.

Olfati, J., Moqbeli, E., Fathollahi, S., and Estaji, A. (2012). Salinity stress effects changed during Aloe vera L. vegetative growth. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 8(2), pp. 152–158.

Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., Dean, L. A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular, Vol 939 (p. 19). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.

Paetsch, L., Mueller, C. W., Kögel-Knabner, I., Von Lützow, M., Girardin, C., Rumpel, C. 2018. Effect of in-situ aged and fresh biochar on soil hydraulic conditions and microbial C use under drought conditions. Scientific reports, 8(1), 6852.

Radmehr, A. 2010. Results of sampling survey of garden product in 2009. Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, Iran.

Ri-Feng, K., Zhang, N.M., Jing, S., Li, B., and C.G. Zhang. 2014. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on soil fertility, wheat growth and nutrient absorption. Soil. Fertilizers. 6:33-38.

Sahani, S., & Sharma, Y. C. (2021). Advancements in applications of nanotechnology in global food industry. Food Chemistry, 342, 128318.

Shojaei SM, Vahabpour A, Saifoddin AA, Ghasempour R. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from Iran's gas flaring by using satellite data and combustion equations. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 May;19(3):735-748. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4684. Epub 2022 Oct 20. PMID: 36151901.

Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., van Dongen, J. T. 2021. Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141607.

Troeh, F. R and L.M. Thompson. 2005. Soils and Soil Fertility, Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, US.

Tylova, M.E., Lorenzen, B., Brix, H., and O. Votrubova. 2005. The effects of NH4 and NO3 on growth, resource allocation and nitrogen uptake kinetics of Phragmites australis and Glyceria maxima. Aquat. Bot. 81:326–342.

Van Zwieten, V.L., Singh, B., Joseph, S., Kimber, S., Cowie, A., and Y.K. Chan. 2009. Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann, J., Joseph, S. (Eds.), Biochar for Environmental Management Science and Technology. Earthscan Press, UK, PP. 227–249.

Walkley, A., Black I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29-38.

Wang, Y., Xu, X., Fang, X., Yao, N., Lei, H., Yang, G., & Hua, Z. (2021). Rationally designing renewable plant oil-based polymers as efficient Nano carriers for sustained pesticide delivery. Chemical Engineering Journal, 450, 138294.

Ward, M.H., deKok, T.M., Levallois, P., Brender, J., Gulis, G., Nolan, B.T., and J. VanDerslice. 2005. Drinking-Water Nitrate and Health Recent Findings and Research Needs. Environ. Health. Perspect. 113: 1607–1614.

Wegner, T. N. 1972. Simple and sensitive procedure for determining nitrate and nitrite in mixtures in biological fluids. J. dairy sc. 55: 642-644.

Zhang A.P., Liu, R.L., Gao, J., Zhang, Q.W., Xiao, J.N., Chen, Z., Yang, S.Q., Hui, J.Z., and L.Z. Yang. 2015. Effects of Biochar on Nitrogen Losses and Rice Yield in Anthropogenic alluvial Soil Irrigated with Yellow River Water. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 33:2395–2403.

Zhang, C., Huang, X., Zhang, X., Wan, L., Wang, Z. 2021. Effects of biochar application on soil nitrogen and phosphorous leaching loss and oil peony growth. Agricultural Water Management, 255, 107022

Author Biographies

Zohreh Shams, University of Tehran

Faculty of Agriculture

Maryam Heidari, University of Tehran

Reza Mokhtari, University of Tehran

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Zohreh Shams, Maryam Heidari, Reza Mokhtari (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.